The situation in Mali is quietly dropping out of the headlines. But last week Ban Ki-moon called for 11,000 peacekeeping troops, possibly backed by combat forces so it’s a good time to be thinking about what the peacebuilding needs are in Mali. The French intervention seems to have been driven by a very short-term view (or perhaps just by the hope for a quick result), based on seeing the problem in terms of terrorism and therefore concentrating on hard security measures. This seems to be backed by a superficial analysis of Mali’s political economy focusing on the north rather than on the whole country and how power is organised, and on the Tuaregs rather than all the different ethnic groups. International Alert has published a briefing paper that goes into the background and explores what is needed for peacebuilding. I have drawn on it for a shorter piece in the Huffington Post.
Tags ‘n’ topicsadaptation Afghanistan Andrew Mitchell arms control Ashton Assad banking reform Brown Bush Cameron carbon emissions carbon trading chemical weapons China Climate change Conservatives Copenhagen David Cameron DFID DPRK Egypt environment EU EU External Action service European politics finance sector food prices food security fragile states G-20 Gaza Gordon Brown green economy human security IMF India inequality International Alert International development international politics Investments Iran Iraq ISIS Israel JCPOA Libya MDGs Middle East multilateralism natural resources Nepal New START Nobel Peace Prize North Korea nuclear weapons Obama Palestine peace agreements peacebuilding peacekeeping poverty public service Putin resilience Russia Rwanda Syria Theresa May trade Trump, Ukraine UN US Yemen