It’s that time of year, right? In fact, that time of the decade – the cusp between one and the next. From the teens to the twenties. So it’s time for my review of the last (what went wrong) and a forward perspective over what’s coming (trends to watch). Except, no.
Recently I asked a group of eminent and wise people for reasons for optimism. There is these days a bias towards pessimism that is simultaneously understandable, debilitating and tedious. I wanted to push back and get eminent wise help in doing so.
Posted in Climate change, Conflict & peace, Cooperation
Tagged artificial intelligence, cyber, democracy, diplomacy, environment, extinction rebellion, New Year 2020, populism, women in politics
Consider some problems: climate change, the challenges of new technologies, the crisis in nuclear arms control, inequalities, freedom of navigation in the Gulf, increasing hunger and food insecurity, demographic pressures, the greater number of armed conflicts in this decade than the previous one, discrimination and repression on the basis of gender or faith or sexual preference, plastic pollution, pandemics, the sixth mass extinction and more. What conclusions can we draw? Continue reading
Posted in Cooperation, The State of the World
Tagged biodiversity, Climate change, conflict, environment, Gulf, hunger, international law, Trump,, wars, world order
The SIPRI Yearbook 2019 is now available on line. It registers key data in the world of peace and security in 2018 and establishes some of the basic indicators that let us track and assess the trends. It is not a comfortable picture.
You can get a quick take on it from my shorthand overview below and/or from the latest short film in our Peace Points series.
Posted in arms control, Climate change, Conflict & peace, nuclear weapons
Tagged arms control, biodiversity, biosphere loss, China, Climate change, environment, hunger, INF Treaty, Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Iran, Iran deal, mass extinction, multilateralism, New START, Russia, US, US-Russia
The Stockholm Resilience Centre has produced a new study of the planetary boundaries, a concept it first unleashed on the planet in 2009. It reveals a worsening situation. It has received considerable media attention as an issue of environmental impact. But it is much more than that. Continue reading