The situation in Mali is quietly dropping out of the headlines. But last week Ban Ki-moon called for 11,000 peacekeeping troops, possibly backed by combat forces so it’s a good time to be thinking about what the peacebuilding needs are in Mali. The French intervention seems to have been driven by a very short-term view (or perhaps just by the hope for a quick result), based on seeing the problem in terms of terrorism and therefore concentrating on hard security measures. This seems to be backed by a superficial analysis of Mali’s political economy focusing on the north rather than on the whole country and how power is organised, and on the Tuaregs rather than all the different ethnic groups. International Alert has published a briefing paper that goes into the background and explores what is needed for peacebuilding. I have drawn on it for a shorter piece in the Huffington Post.
Tags ‘n’ topicsadaptation Afghanistan Andrew Mitchell Ashton Assad Ban Ki-moon banking reform Brown Bush Cameron carbon emissions carbon trading chemical weapons China Climate change Conservatives Copenhagen development aid DFID Egypt EU EU External Action service European politics finance sector food prices food security fragile states G-20 Gaza gender Gordon Brown green economy humanitarian assistance human security IMF India inequality International Alert International development international politics Investments Iran Iraq ISIS Israel Jordan Labour Liberia Libya MDGs Middle East natural resources Nepal Nobel Peace Prize nuclear weapons Obama Palestine peace agreements peacebuilding peacekeeping population poverty public service Putin Qaddafi resilience Russia Rwanda Syria Tony Blair trade UN US World Bank Yemen